Message Board
Sign up Calendar
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 6 of 6     «   Prev   3   4   5   6
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 1,649
Reply with quote  #76 
Nanette, throughout this thread are some things that I  should have addressed earlier:

-the ransom note was found laid out on the rungs of one the lower steps of the spiral staircase between the first and second floor of the house, John Ramsey moved it to the floor under a light so he could quickly read the thing on his hands and knees.

-I forgot the second thing I was gonna say, I'll post about it later

-I sat through the youtube talk where former chief Kolar was plugging his book, he was being cryptic about special information he claims to know but then tells his listeners that if they wanna find out, they have to buy the book. You can hear people moaning after he says this.  He's a pretty dull speaker. He hints that there were cob webs in the window well and that therefore; the parents must have done it! Wow, there's some advance reasoning for you.....not!

I hate the little game they play about how the killer got in the house, like it would be impossible to get in there, like it's Fort Knox or something. What a crock of BS. That would have been one of the easier things to do. It's having all of the inside information the killer(s) had to have to pull the job off.

Like the Ramsey's were dumb enough to brutally kill there own kid, write a 3 page crazy ransom note, dispose of certain items never to be found, yet leave the body in the house! WTF kind of clown detective did BPD and the DA hire in this Kolar stooge? They hired the best when they hired Lou Smit, then they fart him off despite his glowing achievements, then the next team hires this Kolar stooge? WTF I've read that they weren't happy with Kolar, rightfully so, I'd say.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
habituation

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 1,193
Reply with quote  #77 
I haven't indulged in many of the happenings surrounding the cases. I think the creative links are enough to follow, or else I might find myself sucked up in a black hole. I do read your points, and I think that many of them are repeated throughout the threads without fail.
__________________
Have a positive and inspirational day!
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 1,649
Reply with quote  #78 
Kolar is another stooge that's insinuated that suspicion needs to be placed back on the parents in the Ramsey case.1) He was trying to suggest the window grate area to the train room had undisturbed cobwebs in it. This is why I ranted about the fact that getting a 'key to the house' just wouldn't have been a very technically difficult hurdle. A key could have been attained several months ahead of time and via that same window! Several other things point to  show that a rather sophisticated dossier was assembled on the Ramsey's in order to pull off this highly planned out crime.2) While plugging his crappy book, he claimed that John Ramsey said something to him that didn't sink in right away (of course) but later on he says he realized that Ramsey had incriminated himself with this supposed statement. When asked by some people in attendance what it was, he said; "Well, you'll have to buy the book." You can then hear several people moan in the audience. That's pretty cheesy, I'd say.

The basic foundation of reasoning by which stooges like Kolar operate is very faulty indeed. It makes me highly suspicious of him, Arndt, Thomas and others involved in the Ramsey case.

If you every wanna see wholesale corruption in the works, check out the 1967 Mark Lane production "Rush To Judgement", he interviews several eyewitness that saw either the JFK assassination or shooting of Officer JD Tippet, their testimony was ignored or misreported by the Warren commission. Many other  witnessed were threatened, several witnesses died violently, too many in terms of 'odds'. About 18 frames of the Zapruder film show JFK clutching his throat, while Connally is still clutching his hat, then Connally's cheeks puff out and his lapel folds outwards as he is then hit by a separate round. Connally's testimony supports this. 18 frames equals roughly 1 second. That bolt action gun can't even be cycled that fast. Many witness statements dispute the Warren commission report.  Several witnesses said the limo came to a stop after Kennedy was hit, meaning the Zapruder film was tampered with. The stretcher bullet only works if it was the one that hit first hit Kennedy, it won't fit into the wounds received by Connally. I know this seems 'off subject' but the point is to show how many "official" people will continue to lie and distort these two separate cases.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
TerryB

Registered:
Posts: 1,649
Reply with quote  #79 
A summary of this whole thread is this point: Look for evidence of the "under educated" second author in the Karr camp. The postings by this second author seem to happen not too long after Tracey posed another question or contention. Notice that most of the emails from the Karr camp are very redundant 'copy and pasted' statements. Note that the second author's remarks are "off script" when compared to the highly redundant messages from the Karr camp. Then note the specificity of the remarks made by this second author and how they pertain to a guy that's dying of heart disease, as was our main suspect and that this same guy makes statements that show that he's from an earlier generation than that of Karr's.
     Remember that Karr's first message to the media was that: "Her death was accidental." This lie is exactly what the people behind this murder want reinforced into everyone's minds.
     The crime and crime scene clearly shows that the Ramsey murder was 100% premeditated and involve a lot of planning.
     Many more points can be added to the above that show that Karr was "an accessory after the fact". Karr can and should be charged accordingly and I firmly believe that an honest and smart prosecutor can easily convict him on the totality of the evidence that I've cited.
     Yes, Nanette is very correct about the correlations to the Zodiac killer and other cases like Tim Miller's daughter's murder case, in terms of statements that parallel and paraphrase these same cases, but I think that a prosecution case can and should acknowledge this aspect but it should also be made clear that the focus is "first and foremost" about Karr's specific involvement.

__________________
One small bit of info might make all the difference.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.